FDF & FIB Development Blog

As much as it pains me to say this, thank you to the 1976 Raiders for helping make Fast Drive Football a better simulation. I am a life-long Raider hater, but I can't deny that their uniqueness in 1976 - and FDF's inability to capture their amazing performance that year - has led to some fine tuning that should help the 76 Raiders, as well as some other teams, be more accurately represented by my simulation engine. Big shout out to Mark Miller (aka Jerry Cuan) and everyone else who ran the 1976 FDF co-op project that brought this issue to light.

Dialing in Scoring for High Profile Teams

The 1976 Raiders are considered one of the best teams in NFL history, and my game engine "shorts" them in average points per game.  They averaged 25 ppg, but with my engine they will post closer to 22 points per game at the end of a season replay. Basically, any team that was not PROLIFIC or DULL will average somewhere between 18 and 24 points in a given season, depending on how the dice roll, strength of opponents, etc. 

Given the importance of being more accurate with the average ppg for high profile teams, the 1976 Raiders (as well as a number of other teams) now have boutique ratings to bring their ppg average in line with expectations. See the list of seasons below that were impacted. I focused my tweaks on those teams that were in the Super Bowl or Championship games. More tweaks can always be made down the road as they are discovered.

Solving for Intangibles

The other issue with the Raiders is that they exceeded their expected W/L ratio by 3 games. This is rare, and there are only 15 other teams since 1950 that have done this. For these teams I have expanded the EFFICIENT quality with a "Super EFFICIENT" rule. This quality is represented with EFFICIENT underlined. EFFICIENT teams may add or remove two ticks (instead of one) from a play in the last 5 minutes of a half. This change will help give these teams that extra boost they need to convert one more loss into a win.

Of course I had to find the teams who underperformed by 3 games and these teams are given the INEFFICIENT quality. When losing, drives for these teams will take 2 ticks longer, making it even harder for them to score with 5 minutes or less left in the half.

Super EFFICIENT Teams:

• 1962 Pittsburgh

• 1965 Cleveland

• 1976 Oakland

• 1992 Indianapolis

• 1999 Tennessee

• 2004 Pittsburgh

• 2009 Indianapolis

• 2011 Kansas City

• 2011 Green Bay

• 2012 Indianapolis

• 2016 Oakland

• 2019 Green Bay

• 2020 Cleveland

• 2020 Kansas City

• 2021 Las Vegas

• 2022 Minnesota

Super INEFFICIENT Teams:

• 1950 Philadelphia

• 1963 Kansas City

• 1963 Detroit

• 1971 Cincinnati

• 1979 San Francisco

• 1981 New England

• 1989 Cincinnati

• 1990 San Diego

• 2001 San Diego

• 2017 Cleveland

• 2019 Detroit

• 2020 Atlanta

All seasons represented above have been updated - both original and enhanced versions. The v2.0 Pro Game Instructions have been updated with this new rule for Super EFFICIENT and Super INEFFICIENT teams. No changes to the Game Book were required.

Complete list of impacted seasons

As I mentioned above, I updated a bunch of seasons today with both the new Super EFFICIENT/INEFFICIENT quality as well as boutique results for high profile teams that averaged between 24 and 26 points per game. Here is the complete list of seasons that were impacted. If it's a season represented by both the classic and enhanced team cards, both were updated.

1950, 1963, 1965, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1976, 1977, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1987, 1989, 1990, 1992, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1999, 2001, 2004, 2009, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2016, 2017, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022

Super Bowl Teams

I thought I had already posted a file of all Super Bowl teams (in the original team card format) to the website, but when I couldn't find it, I went ahead and created one. The file is available from the Pro Downloads page and includes all the changes mentioned above. 

Hope everyone is having a festive holiday season! -Al

Fast Drive Football is super excited to be going "on the road" to be part of the 2024 Gridiron Games event hosted by Geoff Giordano and the APBA Football Club. The event will be taking place at the Pro Football Hall of Fame on August 24th and 25th. Somewhere between 25 and 30 tabletop football enthusiasts will be converging on the hall for a weekend of APBA, SoM, Breakaway, Match-Up, FDF and more! I'm really looking forward to the weekend as it will be my first time at the Pro Football Hall of Fame. Should be a lot of fun, and I hope to see some of you there.

As part of the weekend, I am planning to host an FDF tournament with as many people that want to participate. In preparation, I've been jotting down notes for FDF H2H rules - to make the game more engaging as a 2-player game.  Here are the rules as they stand today. Once they are fully tested in Canton, I will publish them in here on the FDF website.

FDF 2-Player Rules

Setup

1. Players choose their teams. Each player receives two "Coach Tokens" (explained later)

2. Each player rolls 1d6, highest roll is the home team; re-roll as needed. 

3. It is suggested that you use the weather chart if the home team did not play indoors. Players can agree on a month for the game, or you can use the current month.

4. A coin toss determines who gets to choose to receive or kick to start the game.

Gameplay

As a rule of thumb, the player coaching the team with possession will roll the dice to resolve a drive.

1. • Kickoffs: the coach of the kicking team rolls for the kickoff. If there is a re-roll for an "In The Open" result or a Fumble, the receiving team rolls.

   • Turnovers: The defense rolls the die for the result following a Fumble or Interception.

Coach Tokens

• Coach Tokens allow a coach/player to have some impact in the outcome of a game. Each player receives two tokens to start the game, and they can be used at any time. Use coins, plastic chips from another game, pretzels, whatever you like.

• Once a token is used, it's gone for good. (in other words, you can eat the pretzel)

• Tokens can be used to:

  • Re-roll the dice for ANY result. No exceptions. If you just rolled the dice for some result, you can use a token to re-roll. 

  • Force your opponent to re-roll their last roll. Again, no exceptions for what the opponent was rolling for.

• If a token is used to re-roll a drive result, you will use the the timing die value from the re-rolled drive. Do not add the timing die values together. It is not an extension of the drive, it is as if the original drive never occurred. 

• There is no limit to how many tokens can be spent on a single drive or event.

I still have plans to continue working on both FDF and FIB, but it doesn't look like 2024 is going to be a productive year for either game due to "Real Life". I know this will come as a disappointment to some folks, but this is just a pause - I'm not walking away from either game.

I'm fortunate that I have worked my way into a senior leadership position on a high-profile program within the finance sector. It's easily going to be the biggest / coolest thing I've ever been a part of building, but it is going to take a lot of long days, weeks and months to ensure the team is successful. I wanted to make sure you all knew the reason why I have been relatively quiet since the release of Fast Inning Baseball this past December, and why I expect this trend to continue for the foreseeable future.

Here is what I have on my "to-do list" for both games:

• Fast Drive Football

  • Complete the Enhanced Team Cards for all seasons

  • Expand the features in the Commissioner Expansion

• Fast Inning Baseball

  • Create a way to convert History Maker Baseball players and teams into FIB Teams

  • Create more official FIB Seasons

  • Create the FIB Commissioner Expansion

I appreciate everyone's continued support and enthusiasm for both games, and I will continue to follow the Facebook pages and answer questions when they come up. I still plan on attending the PLAAY Convention later this year, and look forward to seeing many of you there. 

The baseball game continues its long, winding path to release. Now named "Fast Inning Baseball" or FIB, it is still feels like a sibling to FDF but the approach has changed quite a bit since post #18 below from last June. 

Feedback from the 2023 PLAAY.con convinced me that a fast-play baseball game with ONLY team ratings was not going to meet my need for the game to be fun and high on the "play-ability" scale. IIB worked as a score generator, but it didn't have the "one more game" factor that I was looking for.

So back the drawing board I went, and after 100+ games testing the new version I'm excited about the project again. The game now has team cards with individual players, as well as some team qualities - a purposeful blend of both with focus on introducing matchups, without bogging the game down in too many "checks". Pitchers are given a grade derived from WHIP, as well as a grade for stamina and a quality that influences how many home runs they surrender. The bullpen is abstracted into a single grade, but closers are represented as individuals. There are advanced rules for bullpen variability if you want to use them. Batters are graded on their clutch ability, and have a finder for home runs. 

Each season will have its own charts, so it won't be a single "book" like FDF, or an era approach as I was considering before. This ensures that the results from a game from any given season will be true to that season's typical outcomes for Runs, Hits, Errors, and Home Runs. 

Also gone from this current iteration are any tools to create a fictional universe. My focus right now is getting the core mechanics completed, and I've put any plans for a fictional or franchise mode aside for the time being. 

I'm targeting a Holiday Season 2023 release, with 1980 and 1982 being guaranteed to be released. Other seasons are TBD. And yes, the game will be donation-ware just like FDF. Given the time it takes to complete a season, and my continued busy schedule, I can guarantee that seasons for FIB will not be produced at the same rate as they were for FDF. 

Sample team card shown below.

It only took about 12 hours to get over 20 play-testers for my new baseball game in development so I am going to stop accepting requests at this time. Thanks to everyone that has responded!!

Hello!! I have some news to share with you all...

I've applied the same FDF mechanics to a team-quality based baseball game and it's ready for some additional outside testing. The game has specific boards for various eras in history and I don't have time to test them all to ensure they are producing the results I expect. 

Here is a little more about the game....

Instant Innings Baseball is an inning-by-inning quick-play baseball game that uses team-qualities to drive the engine. There are no individual players or player-finders. Games take about 5 minutes to play, and there is even an instant-result roll where you can get both a winner and final score. In addition to the inning results, there are additional charts that keep each teams qualities fluid through a season campaign.

There are charts for the following specific era's in the game:

• 2016-Present

• 1996-2015

• 1947-1995

• 1920-1946

• 1900-1919

• 1871-1899

I have at least one season created for each of these eras but the game comes with instructions if you want to create a specific season or league. If you test I will need you to keep the line scores for every game including total runs, hits, home-runs, and errors. I will also need you to play at least 20-30 games with a variety of teams.

I am eager to find people interested in testing the years 1871 to 1919, especially those who might want to share some improved era-specific narrative with me to include in the game.

I'll probably stop taking testers once I have 2-3 people testing each era, so I apologize in advance if I don't get you into the program. If you think you might be interested in helping me test, please drop me an email at alwilsond6@gmail.com and let me know what era you can help test.

Here is the introduction from the instructions for some addition information. 

Instant Inning Baseball (IIB) is a baseball sandbox designed for tabletop gamers who want a “beer & pretzels” (read: very light) solitaire experience. In addition to projects using historical teams, IIB provides the basic tools necessary to build a custom fictional baseball universe, play out each game in a schedule, and progress from season to season. The league narrative is driven by additional charts that will impact the fortunes (or misfortunes!) of the teams that inhabit the baseball world you create. 

IIB is an extremely light simulation of the game of baseball and the factors that go into the ebbs and flows of an individual franchise. There are no individual players, nor are there complicated franchise mechanics. However, the framework of the game will easily allow for your home-brewed ideas if you decide you want to add any of these elements to the game. The Game Day Drama! And Streaks & Slumps charts will add some variability to the in-season performance of the teams in your league, but these mechanics can easily be skipped if desired.

Each team in IIB is defined by a number of qualities and grades that impact their performance. You can start with real world historical leagues and teams, or you can quickly roll-up your own. The historical teams provided as samples, and the instructions for creating IIB teams from real world statistics are not meant to imply that this is an accurate replay simulation. Using the era-specific Game Day charts will provide a reasonable representation of that era, but given the season-to-season fluctuations in run scoring and other factors, IIB results will never meet the accuracy requirements of most “replay” gamers. The goal was for the game to be fast, fun, and produce believable results.

Work is progressing very nicely on the next version of Fast Drive Football. I'm putting so much time into this release that I am going to call it Version 2.0. Here is a summary of what you can expect when I drop the new Pro and College games in early 2023.

Quality of Life Improvements

• Instructions updated with larger text, and more examples

• Game Book updated with helpful chart usage instructions and a Game Reference at the end to cover those tricky end of game timing situations.

Game Enhancements

• Optional Extreme Weather effects (see post #16 below)

• Chance for blocked punts (see post #16 below)

• Improved "blocked kick" rule for 11-66 kickers

• Chances for a "pick-6" or a "scoop-and-score" now better tuned to pro and college averages

• 4th Down "Go For It" success percentage now better tuned to pro and college averages

• New mechanic giving teams a chance for a FGA if they are in GREAT field position with no time left on the clock

The next two enhancements coming to FDF will be better representing the chance of a blocked punt, and the inclusion of weather factors. I don't plan on publishing the changes in a new book until 2023, but since I am testing these changes with my current fictional season, I thought I would share the ideas with the community so that you can help test if you like!

Blocked Punts
In the current game book, blocked punts are relegated to the Unusual Plays section, which doesn't give them a realistic chance of occurrence. The realistic target I am aiming for is a that there should be .1 blocked punts per game across the league. That means with every punt, assuming about 10 total punts a game, there should be about about a 1% chance of a block. Were gonna get that 1/100 chance by changing one of the 1/36 PUNT rolls to a possible blocked punt (2.8% chance) and having a re-roll of 1 or 2 (taking it down to about 1%) result in a blocked punt. Finally, some additional drama when punting!! For testing purposes, this is what I am using. Note that the final implementation in the game book may differ slightly:

Any PUNT
15 Heavy punt rush! Roll 1d6: on a roll of 1 or 2 the punt is BLOCKED!; otherwise AVERAGE field position. If BLOCKED, roll 1d6: on a roll of 5 or 6 the defense scoops up the ball and scores a Touchdown!; otherwise GREAT field position.

Weather
I'm excited to bring some weather factors to FDF, to better recreate classic real-life matchups and to add some narrative to fictional leagues. Keith at PLAAY has given me permission to use his Extreme Weather chart format, so what you see below may look familiar. The primary impacts to a game of FDF due to extreme weather will be:

• Reduced FG/XP kicking success ranges in extreme conditions

• Lower scoring in extreme rain and snow (attained by adding +1 to the timing die result for fewer scoring opportunities. For example, a red die '1' becomes a red die '2')

• More turnovers in extreme rain (attained by giving all teams the CLUMSY quality - note that any teams who are SECURE keep that quality, they can have both.)

• Reduced passing effectiveness in extreme wind or snow (attained by changing a couple TD PASS results to field goal attempts.)

Here is what I am using for testing, feel free to share your feedback with me.

As I was playing out the first season of my IHFL league, I was reminded that the typical FDF team card is quite deterministic when you know how the game works. You can immediately identify the best and the worst teams, and those teams that will need some lucky rolls to win the big game. There is nothing "hidden" that can impact the results. This is important for a simulation, especially when playing with real teams that need to perform like they did in real life.

For a fictional universe, however, you can afford some additional randomness to keep things interesting, and create some unexpected narrative shifts. As I played my season, the static nature of my fictional teams from week to week began to feel more like a weakness than a strength from a narrative standpoint. This got me thinking about a new mechanic, which I am introducing here.

As I thought about the problem, I knew that I wanted to create a new "in-season" mechanism to drive changes to the team cards. I wanted the mechanism to be easy to execute but I wanted the team changes to be meaningful. The idea of "Breaking News" was hatched. For this first iteration (in the v1.2 update of the Commissioner Expansion) these changes will take the form of 1) key injuries, and 2) FA signings, personnel development, and other positive events. Injuries will be the more prevalent result (like real life), so the "boosts" from a positive result become that much more memorable and special.

Since the changes can be quite impactful, there will only be a 1-in-3 chance that there will be an event in a given week, and an event will only impact one team. This means that around 5 or 6 teams will have something happen to change the qualities on their card during a season. Of course, a single team could also find themselves in the headlines more than once!

I'll be using this new mechanic in my second season with the IHFL, and the updated Commissioner Expansion is available now if anyone wants to try it out. I'm looking forward to a little more chaos and less predictability in Season 2, and would love to hear from anyone that gives it a go with their leagues!

The final standings played out very close to what I expected, and so did the scoring totals for all the teams. The biggest surprises were the issues that I have just addressed with the 1.3 update (returns and interceptions). The "legitimate" outlier from a stats perspective were the turnovers for Phoenix. They were getting the worst rolls and it was actually funny from a narrative perspective - being "snake bit" by the turnover bug.  And to be clear they did have the "SHAKY" quality so I expected more INT's from them, but they also had the SECURE• quality, and should have had fewer fumbles than most teams. Instead, they got hammered time and time again by teams with the "ACTIVE" quality. 

In the "pleasantly surprised" category comes the home field advantage. I designed the game book to provide the home team with about a 5% advantage, and that's just what we saw in season one, with the home team winning 30 of the 56 games for a 54% win rate.

So with Season 1 in the rear view mirror it was with great excitement that I opened up the Commissioner Expansion to "roll-up" the off-season, and it didn't disappoint! Here is a team by team breakdown of what transpired.

San Diego Surge
Bolstered by the first pick in the draft, the Surge made great strides in the offseason, dropping their INEPT quality, and adding an EFFICIENT offense and semi AGGRESSIVE defense. They should easily improve on their 2-12 record in year 2.

Denver Avengers
Make no mistake, coach Glen Collier is in the hot seat, and needs to post a winning record in year 2. Denver used their high draft picks and the free agent market to drop both their DULL and semi INEPT qualities and will look to improve on a disappointing first season. Their front office was credited for some of the best off season moves and improved from a grade of C to B. Unfortunately, their beloved LOYAL owner passed away and his SELFISH son has assumed control of the franchise. Fans are hoping this doesn't spell problems for a franchise finally finding it's groove.

Charlotte Monarchs
Charlotte had a very quiet offseason, with none of the moves they made having a material impact. Milt Schroeder has already dropped a grade from B to C, and with another losing season may find himself in the hot seat. Don't expect the Monarchs to compete in the east this season.

Pittsburgh Pounders
There is excitement in Pittsburgh, a town already known for its passion for the game. Pittsburgh signed a young superstar wide receiver looking for a second chance, and their offense improved from semi PROLIFIC to full PROLIFIC. They also had a good draft, improving their defense to semi PUNISHING. The Pounders were knocking on the door in year one, and seem poised to break it down in year two!

Philadelphia Flames
Seems the Flames had all the press this offseason. From the Hard Knocks series, to their SELFISH owner refusing to increase the budget for player signings! It was anyone's guess how they would look entering the season, but they seem to have landed on their feet.  They lost their star running back to Seattle (and their PROLIFIC quality), but they now boast one of the toughest, STAUNCH defenses in the league. Clearly, they learned from Boston this past season that defense wins Championships! Should be a great battle in the East this season with 3 teams in the hunt!

Boston Bulldogs
They were the champions in Season 1, but enter Season 2 as underdogs. Their offense remains basically the same, but they have lost a step on defense dropping from full STAUNCH to semi STAUNCH. They will be in the hunt, but it looks like Philly and Pittsburgh may have their number this year.

Phoenix Fangs
This is the team that just wouldn't go away last year, and Season 2 looks no different.  They are SOLID, SECURE, and EFFICIENT on offense and PUNISHING on defense. They should mix it up well with the upstarts San Diego and Denver, but they may not have enough in the tank to win the division again this season.

Seattle Serpents
Seattle's loss in the Division Championship game set in motion one of the most aggressive offseason programs in memory. Through the draft and free agency, Seattle improved their offense from semi DULL to PROLIFIC (3% chance of that happening!) and their defense from semi STAUNCH to full STAUNCH. They look to be INEFFICIENT on offense and UNDISCIPLINED on defense, but the Serpents are poised to cruise through the season and into the Championship game. They are going to be must-see-TV this season for sure.

East Projected Standings: 1) Philadelphia, 2) Pittsburgh, 3) Boston, 4) Charlotte
West Projected Standings: 1) Seattle, 2) Phoenix, 3) San Diego, 4) Denver

Thanks for reading! Hope you are all enjoying the Commissioner Expansion as much as I am!!

Back in May, I finally decided to start my own long-term fictional league using the Commissioner Expansion. 56 games later I have come to the end of the first regular season of the Iron Horse Football League. I kept stats on all the major categories as I progressed, hoping to validate that the 1.2 pro game book was producing the results I was aiming for.  The scoring engine performed perfectly, which was expected. Two other areas weren't as perfect as I would like, so I am now in the process of testing version 1.3 as I roll into the playoffs.

Special Teams - The Kick/Punt Return Game & the 66 roll...
Wow! I'm actually surprised that nobody has complained up until now, because I really missed the mark! The game book is supposed to give an ELECTRIC kick returner a 6% chance to return a kickoff or punt for a TD.  Over the course of a 16 game season, that equates to about 2 TD returns on average for an ELECTRIC return team. In my 56 games, I had only 1 return for a TD ... all season for all teams! And there were plenty of ELECTRIC returners! 

Turns out that the kickoff and punt charts were only giving ELECTRIC returners a 1.5% chance of scoring a TD when they touched the ball. Ooops! :). Version 1.3 will fix this in both the pro and college game book. Here's how the percentages break down in version 1.3 for the Kick Return game:

• ELECTRIC Kick Return Team: 6% chance to score a TD

• ELECTRIC• Kick Return Team: 3% chance to score a TD

• No Quality Kick Return Team: 0.5% chance to score a TD (I wanted the chance for a rare return here)

The punt charts received a similar update, but the chances for a TD decrease from PUNT-BU to PUNT to PUNT-CO. I'm pretty excited about the changes I've made to the punt charts as they provide a little more narrative to the importance of field position.

• ELECTRIC Punt Return Team: 6% chance to score a TD when kicking team is backed up, 5% chance on a normal punt, and only a 1% chance on a coffin corner punt. (I know that is almost an outdated term now - but I'm old so....)

• ELECTRIC• Punt Return Team: 3% chance to score a TD when kicking team is backed up, 2.5% chance on a normal punt, and only a 0.5% chance on a coffin corner punt. 

• No Quality Punt Return Team: 0.5% chance to score a TD when kicking team is backed up, 0.2% chance on a normal punt, and no chance on a coffin corner punt.

Additionally, during my 56 games, I grew more and more annoyed that a roll of '66' on kickoffs and punts didn't mean anything super special. I'm really glad I needed to make this change to the charts as it has given me a reason to make '66' an ELECTRIC check for kickoffs and punts (along with 11 & 12). I know many of you have come to memorize these charts, but I'm sure you'll adapt and memorize them in their new configuration in no time!!

Turnovers
If you've been here since the beginning, you know that "too many turnovers" was a knock on the game when it first was released. I made some pretty substantial changes in both v1.1 and v1.2 to address the concerns. The target mark for the modern Pro game is 0.5 fumbles per game on average, and 0.8 interceptions per game on average. In my pro league, fumbles were right on the mark, with a 0.5 league average. The high mark was 0.7 and the low mark was 0.23. Again, right on the money for what the engine is supposed to produce. So no changes required here. College book is good as well.

Interceptions, on the other hand, were noticeably low, at an average of 0.56 per game. After crunching the numbers, I determined that I needed to add a 1% chance of an interception per drive. The third column of result 2-3-3 was changed from PUNT to INTERCEPTION to provide this 1% lift. This same change is being made to the college book.

Version 1.3
That covers all the changes you will see in Version 1.3 (Pro & College). 

• New Kickoff Chart

• New Punt Charts

• Updated Drive Result for result 2-3-3

I'll be testing these changes over the next week and plan to release the new game book in early September. Really looking forward to the upcoming NFL season. Go Steelers!!

As everyone has seen by now, I have announced a 12/25 release date for the college version of the game. I've been having a blast with the game in testing, and I can't wait to get it into your hands. Changes to the college version are driven by two factors: 1) increasing scoring averages throughout the years, and 2) team-strength disparity across the ~130 team landscape.  

To address the variable scoring averages, I had to create a new scoresheet game clock for three eras of college football. The eras are 1) pre-1968 where the scoring average is ~16 points per game per team, 2) 1968 to 1995 where the scoring average is consistent with NFL averages of ~22 points per game per team, and 3) the modern college game where the scoring average is ~28 points per game per team. The game will come with a custom scoresheet for each era, each with the appropriate game clock.

The solution for the team-strength issue has proven out extremely well in testing. The new STAR quality is what has necessitated changes to the Drive Result charts. Sprinkled in the charts are the STAR checks, and while I was in there I worked with Harvey Couch to bring some more collegiate flavor to the narrative, especially the Unusual Results. It's a subtle change, but I hope people appreciate it.

I know most of you can't wait to get your hands on the team creation guide, and I will be releasing a bunch of teams myself to get things kickstarted. I will be carding the top 32 teams (by SRS rating) for the 2018, 2019, and 2020 seasons. I am an Army/Navy brat so I will be carding the military academy teams too - no matter their standing. And because the team creation process requires pooling all Div-I FBS teams together to determine the qualities, I will post the team-creation spreadsheets too. That way, if you want to play a game with a non-carded team you can either whip up your own card with the qualities from the spreadsheet, or just write the team qualities on the scoresheet. I will release this spreadsheet with each new season.

A point about team creation when looking at teams from seasons prior to the year 2000. Getting team stats for turnovers, penalties, sacks and other qualities can be difficult for these seasons. The good news is that you can still field a Div-1 FBS team in FDFC with only average points for/against and their SRS rating, all of which can be found on sports-reference.com/cfb going back many years. You can then either ignore the other qualities or assign them based on historical knowledge or anecdotal evidence of team strengths and weaknesses. No matter which approach you take, the game will "work". 

I have already had a couple of requests for an expansion to the college game for off-season progression, recruiting, etc. It's a fantastic idea, but I have no plans to invest time in such an expansion at this time. Real-life has given me a great new opportunity at work, and I need to focus on that with all of my available energy in the new year.

Happy Holidays!!

I initially had zero plans to support college teams with FDF, but I was eventually won over by the enthusiasm of the community. Some college teams have already been made for the game by gamers, but I knew the engine would need to be tweaked for the games to feel like college football. 

The first problem to solve had to do with the core simulation engine. The FDF engine assumes an average of 22 points per game for an average team, where the modern college game (2000 to today) is much higher, now approaching 29-30 points per game. The way to address this issue was not a change to the game book, but rather a change to the game timing. By changing the value of each "tick" of the clock to be 60s - instead of 1m 15s - I was able to bump up the number of drives per team to 13/14 a game, which is closer to the actual college average (again - speaking about the modern era) and thus the scoring average issue was solved. 

Once I had solved the timing and elevated scoring average, I had to modify the guide for team creation. It was just a matter of sliding the scale up from an average of 22 to an average of 28. Choosing 28 allows for realistic scoring outcomes from 2000 to today. If people want to try to create teams from years prior to 2000, then using the NFL average of 22 will work fine. Of course, this only holds true until about as far back as 1968, before which scoring was even lower, so an average of 16 would be best. Tying this all back to the timing comment above, this means that each scoring "era" will have its own game clock. Modern college football will have 15 ticks per quarter, 1968 to 1999 will have 12 ticks per quarter, and pre-1968 games will only have 9 ticks per quarter. I will make scoresheets with all 3 variations available when I release the game.

The biggest challenge, by far, was coming up with an elegant solution for the power disparity in college football. I tried a number of different solutions, leveraging various publicly available ranking systems, but I finally settled on the SRS method used on sports-reference.com. SRS stands for Simple Rating System, and it takes into account strength of schedule and average point differential. It aligns perfectly with FDF as a score generator, and allowed me to develop a unique game-situational quality that is activated by new readings in the game book.  Before the game starts, you will compare the SRS ratings of the two teams, and if one team has an advantage of 3 points or more, they will be given a "Star" quality of 1 to 5 depending on the difference. The system works really well and does a good job of highlighting the difference between the teams.

Rounding out the package will be a new chart for overtime, and the guide for creating teams. Creating teams will be straightforward for modern seasons since the data is all easily available. The father back you go, however, it becomes harder to find information on sacks, etc. There's not much I can do about that, and in cases where you can't find data for a particular stat I would suggest skipping that set of qualities altogether. I should also explain that team creation for college is exactly the same as it is for the pros, which means that all 130 Division-1 (FBS) teams are rated relative to each other. This means that you can't just pick one team and create a card for them - you need to collect the data for all teams in order to create 1 or all of them. It may sound like a lot of work, but it's not that hard to do (I use sports-reference.com for most stats and CFBstats.com for the sack data). 

I'm excited to release the game, and expect to have it ready to go (with 2019, 2020, and 2021 top 30 teams) by the end of January, 2022. I expect I will release the top 30 teams in my card format every year. Let me know if you have any questions over on the Facebook group.

The Commissioner Expansion is almost complete! Well, the initial release anyway, there's always going to be a fast-follow-on for anything with so many words - even with spell check, etc. I did my best to keep the instructions concise, but I needed them to be clear too, so it may look somewhat intimidating at first glance. You will get a couple pages worth of an introduction, 4 pages of instructions for how to create a new league from scratch, 5 pages of instructions to progress a league from one season to the next, and 12 pages of tables to support league creation and off-season progression. Additionally, there are a dozen pages of tables if you want to randomly assign team locations and nicknames, as well as head coach names. Then rounding the package out are 6 pages covering some sample league schedules and a quick-play table. 

There will also be supplemental material posted to this website including some quick-start fictional leagues created by myself and Bob Hansen, as well as templates for creating your own teams. I will be providing both Affinity Publisher templates for those that want to create cards on their computer, as well as PDF templates so you can print cards and complete them by hand. I really wanted to support a more accessible software platform for the cards like Google Sheets, Excel or Word, but in the end I wasn't happy with the results so I decided to leave it to the community. Thats said, Affinity Publisher is really a great piece of software and not very expensive so I highly recommend it if you want to create cards that look like mine.

I will release the expansion on or before Thanksgiving. In the meantime I plan on making a few walkthrough videos that I will post here leading up to the expansions release. 

When I started developing the engine for Fast Drive Football, I was primarily focused on the season-over-season distribution of "points per game" or PPG for every pro team during any given season. After all, at its core FDF is simply a pro-football final score generator. I was struck by how similar the numerical mean (average) of season scoring was over the span of 50+ years. It didn't take long to realize that I could leverage this fact and build a reasonable simulation model and game. 

About the time I was working on the game, I was also reading business books about enterprise transformation models in the technology sector and I came across a quote that has stuck with me to this day, "All models are wrong, but some are useful." - George Box. You can go down a statistics-focused rabbit-hole on the Web if you search on that phrase, and I encourage you to do so because while the articles won't discuss tabletop-gaming, the parallels are easy to observe. My takeaway was that modeling the real-world is never going to be an exact science, but with some insight into the subject being modeled you can create something useful (and fun!).

A number of years ago, Keith Avallone taught me that the parity in professional sports can be leveraged from a simulation perspective. This insight, coupled with what I was learning on Wiki pages and YouTube convinced me to focus on normal data sets, standard deviation, and the 68-95-99 rule. By applying the formulas, it didn't take long to realize that no matter what NFL statistic I was looking at, the 68-95-99 rule was reasonably accurate and would be the perfect mechanism to base the FDF quality system around. In a nutshell, the rule states that in a normal data set (like the NFL) the values within one standard deviation of the mean account for about 68% of the set. That simple mathematical concept is the beating-heart of the "chaos engine" for FDF - any team in the "average" distribution for any particular statistical category does not get a quality in that category. That means that they have just as good of a chance of performing 34% better or 34% worse than the average. What's so interesting to observe, however, is how often they don't deviate from their actual performance.

So what about the teams who don't fit the average data set in a particular category? Those are the teams that earn a quality. The qualities are the statistical magnets that pull the performance of a team into the other 32% - either the top or bottom 16%. So if you wondered why more qualities weren't distributed to the teams, that's the reason. 

PPG is the primary statistic driving the FDF engine and the game-book results. As some people have already observed, it's not a season-by-season evaluation (e.g. the top/bottom 16%) but instead a static range applied to all seasons. The model is centered on the mean and one standard deviation for the NFL from 1960 to today. This helps explain why I was hesitant to support the 1950's, but we got it to work out in the end. It should also help explain why supporting the college game with the current game-book is a challenge - the Pro Game is a model of normal distribution, but the college game is not. That said, I have some ideas percolating for the college game and look forward to the challenge.

I think the most important asset that a game developer has is friends. 

There are friends that have ideas for your game and friends who don't even know you play board games. For the former, friends in the hobby are an unlimited source of ideas. The ideas may not always meet the vision you have for the game - but they often spark a fresh thought that helps progress development forward. As for those other friends, they are good to give your mind a rest... because focusing on something different from time-to-time is essential to avoiding burn-out. 

Over the past couple of weeks I was primarily focused on testing. During testing, one of my aforementioned friends asked if we could use a quick-play result table to resolve games quickly. A few minutes later he sent me a draft, and today that draft has become part of the game materials. It's something I probably wouldn't have considered adding to the expansion, but now that it's there I can't imagine not having it.  

About the same time I asked for ideas on how to expand the narrative around team owners. Less than a day later my small 1d6 table had turned into a 2d6 table with a bunch of fun results to add some "flavor" to the off-season. I couldn't have done it alone. 

Development and testing is exactly where I had hoped it would be by this time. I am still on track to have all materials completed by the end of the month so that I can expand the testing group a bit wider and get feedback on the near-final product. Onward!!

I've never been a morning person. Like EVER. But for some reason, all of my ideas for FDF come in my sleep or first thing in the morning. After many hours of testing and tweaking this weekend, I was BURNT OUT last night. I figured I was done for a couple days at least, but this morning I woke up with a solution to a problem I was noodling on, as well as another "fun" idea.

Before I get to that however, I wanted to share some great news. I took the time tonight to build a spreadsheet so that I could simulate unlimited seasons of quality progression changes at the push of a button. The math works!!  (I'm generally surprised when anything I create works.) Over a hundred year span, any given team will have an average offense 65% of the time. The other 35% will be split between any combination of PROLIFIC and DULL. Same numbers apply for the defense as well. When teams do go on a HOT or COLD run of seasons, they never last for more than 5 years. This was exactly what I wanted the system to create when I developed the progression tables. 

My first thought looking at these results is that the core tables for creating teams and progressing from season to season are good enough to stand on their own. You could absolutely use these tables without any of the fluff that I'm adding to the expansion and have a solid method to progress your football universe year over year. I'll make sure that is clear in the instructions. The expansion is completely modular.

So now that I've said that, let me tell you about some fluff I just added! LOL!! Something about the Head Coach and Front Office interaction left me a little flat in all of my testing. Part of it was the 13-step grading system. Too much detail that had no real use. So it's been replaced by a simpler 5-point scale (A, B, C, D, F). But most good systems require 3-way tension, and I was missing that third piece. So today I added Franchise Owners into the mix. They now appear in both league setup, as well as the off-season. They come in 3 flavors with this first version: Insightful, Patient, and Interfering. Teams with an insightful owner stand a chance of getting more Influence Points, and teams with an interfering owner are going to be frustrated by their antics from time to time.  Patient owners are just there in the background, hands-off, no impact to day-to-day operations. It will be fun to figure out ways to use the owner quality as I continue development....

The draft is over, and the players are reporting to camp. So while the annual draft and free agency was all about establishing the new offense and defense profile for each team, Training Camp is about establishing the rest of the team qualities, along with the chance for something unexpected to happen that may shake things up a bit.

Front Office Grade Adjustment & Franchise Influence Points.

As teams enter Training Camp, Front Offices are being graded on how well (or how poorly) the off-season went. Their new grade will be used to once again assign Influence Points to be used during training camp as the remaining qualities are assigned. The Head Coach grade is used again for IP's as well.

Quality Assignments

Like the inaugural draft, a blind draw is used to distribute the remaining (non-Profile) qualities for offense and defense.  The teams then move on to the charts for establishing the special team ratings. Unlike the system for determining offense and defense profile - where the update is dependent on the team's profile from the previous season - the slate is wiped clean for the other qualities (turnovers, discipline, efficiency). I'm still noodling on if I want any dependencies here, but in the interest of streamlining the system, probably not...

Unexpected Events

There is a 36 row table called Unexpected Events that is the final step before kicking-off a new season. At the moment, there are 18 positive results and 18 negative results. Anything from a new special teams coach improving a place-kicker’s success range, to a rebuilt offensive line not coming together and sticking the team with the POROUS quality, to surprise late free agent signing that makes the team PROLIFIC•. 

I'm currently saying that a random draw of 25% of the league will be required to be a candidate to roll on this table. I'm also saying that if a team still has a remaining IP, they can defer from rolling. 

While writing these first six blog posts I have come across a number of issues that still need resolving... So while I'm happy with the progress to date, there is still much work to be done before it's done. :)

This is the heart of the Commissioner Expansion. The fans of each franchise hope their team improves through the draft and free agency, but not everyone can be that lucky. In addition to the Influence Points earned by the Front Office and Head Coach of each franchise, bonus IP's are earned by teams who earned a high draft pick with their bottom-of-the-barrel record. Specifically, the worst record in the league earns +2 IP, and the rest of the bottom 15% of the league earns +1. 

Annual Draft & Free Agency

The annual draft & free agency are abstracted into a single series of off-season steps for determining a teams new offense and defense profiles. Teams will roll on charts that take their current offensive and defensive profile into account, and teams have an opportunity to use their IP's to influence the outcomes, in the form of re-rolls. The charts are designed so that it is hard for a PROLIFIC or STAUNCH team to keep that quality - so opportunities for re-rolls are key. It is more likely that they will at least drop a semi-quality, or even go back to average. Of course, it's also possible they get EVEN BETTER, or flip the script and go from first to worst (or vice versa).  (The same can be said for DULL and INEPT teams of course. ).  

The charts are simply result-oriented at this time, without narrative, relying on the gamer to imagine what may have happened to drive the outcome. This could be expanded - it's something to think about.

Once the draft and free agency are complete, it's time to head to Training Camp! Training camp is when the "unexpected" stuff can happen to a team. :)

Before we do, however, lets take a look at what what happened in the CEL during this phase of the off-season. See notes in the Off Season Outcomes column.

The first season of the CEL was exciting, with both division races being decided on the last weekend of the 12-game season!  In the end, it was the Anaheim Gunslingers defeating the Birmingham Tornadoes 30-16 in the Championship Game. Now that the season drama is complete, it's time for the off-season fun!!

This post is going to talk about the first part of the Off-Season phase, determining the impact of the previous season on Front Office and Head Coach grades, resolving the Coaching Carousel, and finally doling out the all important Influence Points. To illustrate, I've copied my league notes below although on your tabletop all of this information could be penciled onto your team cards.

Front Office Grades

Front offices of teams that had success in the playoffs have their grade increased, and those that had losing seasons will see a decrease to their grade. There is not much activity in my league since I have a very simple playoff system - only the division winners advance to the Championship Game. Front Offices are never "replaced" (at least that's not built into the system now!), but random off-season events may also impact their grades. 

Note that for the grades and the upcoming Influence Points, much of the testing period will be ensuring the balance of all these factors are right.

Head Coach Grades & The Coaching Carousel

Head coach grades are much more volatile than the Front Office grades. The average tenure of a Pro Football Head Coach is around 3-4 years, and I am trying to tune the CE system to replicate that as much as possible. You'll see that after only one season, we already have 3 coaches on the hot seat!! They are the names in orange below. They ended up on the Hot Seat after having to roll on the Coaching Carousel table, which they did because they were either already on the Hot Seat (they weren't), or they had a grade of C- or worse. If they post a winning record next year, they are REMOVED from the Hot Seat. However, if they remain on the Hot Seat, they will have a 50% chance of getting fired at the end of next season. (No, I do not have mid-season Head Coach firings in the game.) At any rate, next season will have another layer of intrigue as coaches begin fighting for their jobs.

Assignment of Franchise Influence Points

Before the Annual Draft and Free Agency, you will determine the number of Influence Points that each franchise will have to spend. See the purple column below. The points come directly from Front Office and Head Coach grades. As noted above, I'm still balancing these values but I think they are close. 

As we get ready for the annual draft, Orlando is optimistic that they can make a splash in the offseason, while Birmingham is hoping to solidify their spot as a top team in the East, maybe even making a return trip to the big game. Monte Landry is already making his case to be the first HOF caliber Head Coach in the CEL. Of course Norman Green i=has now been thrust into the spotlight as a top-tier head coach too, so their annual meetings will be VERY interesting! Anaheim is poised to build a dynasty to last a LONG time, but Muncie should have a good off-season if the rolls go their way. Good stuff!!!

As I wrote in the previous post, the creation of Offense and Defense Profiles unlocked the effectiveness of the draft module. I won't bore you with the details, but after researching the past 50 years of the NFL, I found a stable pattern of certain qualities for the top teams and the bottom teams in the league. In Fast Drive Football terms, this pattern applies to the scoring qualities (PROLIFIC/DULL/STAUNCH/PROLIFIC), ball control qualities (DYNAMIC/ERRATIC/STIFF/SOFT), and sack/o-Line qualities (SOLID/POROUS/PUNISHING/MILD). 

The draft begins with another series of blind draws. Yep, you'll need those printed cards again! (Folks that want to build a boring spreadsheet to automatically determine the draws are free to do so!) Following a couple more procedural rules, you will determine the teams that are at the top and bottom of your league in terms of offensive and defensive power. There are special charts that these teams will roll against in order to determine the "profile" that applies to them. Influence points earned when the Front Office and Head Coach were established can also be spent during this phase to influence the results. It's fun!

Once the top and bottom league powers are established, the draft continues to assign all of the other qualities including special teams. I'm estimating the time to create your league from scratch, assign Front Office Grades and Head Coaches, and run the inaugural draft will take about an hour - give or take depending on much drama you create for yourself when drawing the team cards for good or bad outcomes. :)

The process to create the league is fun and working really well. Here is how the draft played out for my league. The rest of the long weekend will be spent focusing on testing the off-season progress process.

The first part of the expansion to come together was the process to create a whole new league from scratch. The biggest problem that needed to be solved was that the distribution of qualities could not be random. There are some qualities on both side of the ball that naturally accompany each other.  The light-bulb eventually went off and "Profiles" were born.  It distributes the primary points-for/against qualities properly, and it speeds up the inaugural draft considerably. But I'm getting ahead of myself...

The first step in creating a new league in the CE is awarding franchises to locations. I decided to go with a 12 team league with two divisions to start. There is no way that the book I am creating could cover all the interesting locations that you are all going to want to bring your teams to, so I have started with a simple 100 location chart filled with cities/regions that have had pro football teams in real life.  There is a similar table for franchise mascots/nicknames. It was fun to roll up the league, and I might add a few more "starter" tables before release. 

The next step was to randomly assign grades to the Front Office of each franchise. This step includes a "blind-draw" mechanism (because I enjoy shuffling the cards and picking them at random like History Maker Golf!) so I printed cards for each team. I then selected 3 of the teams (25%) to be my premier front offices and receive either an A- or A grade (rolling a decider die for the result). I then selected 3 more teams (25%) to be my poor front offices following the same procedure. For the rest of the teams, there is a table provided to resolve their grade. (From C- to B+).  This could all be done with a spreadsheet of course, but the rules will ask that the gamer actually print and shuffle cards.  

Next I needed for the Front Offices to hire their Head Coaches. This was particularly fun since I built first name and last name tables for the coaches too. I used a mix of authentic pro football coach names, as well as some FDF community members. Once I had the names, I rolled on a table to determine their grades. The table takes into account the grade of the Front Office, so it is more likely for a better front office to get themselves a good Head Coach.  

The final step in the process was to assign Influence Points (IP) to the teams based on their Front Office and Head Coach grades. These Influence Points will be used in the Inaugural Draft.  Here is the league, just before the start of the draft....

During the acceleration of game development in 2020, my friends would often comment about how good of an engine FDF would make for a fictional football league. I agreed with them, but my focus was squarely on the goal of making FDF as fun as possible for the solitaire historical-replay gamer. The idea for a fictional mode was always in the back of my head, but I forced myself to keep from working on it until I released version 1.0 of the game to the public.

When version 1.0 was released on 7/23/21, the acceptance of the game into the mainstream tabletop sports simulation hobby was way beyond my expectations. I had originally expected to work on seasons for a while and then eventually get around to the fictional mode at some point when all the seasons were done. But those plans changed pretty quickly. With all of the data and questions I was receiving, I realized that the engine needed some fine tuning in a couple areas. So, version 1.1 became a priority. Around the same time, enthusiastic gamers were also trying to home-brew their own teams (including fictional teams), and they began talking about systems for season-to-season progression. Their passion became somewhat of a boost to the ideas I had percolating, so I committed to begin working on the fictional mode once version 1.1 was complete.

Version 1.1 of FDF was released 8/25/21, one month after the initial release of the game. In my opinion, the game book is as good as it can be with the amount of wiggle-room that was intentionally baked in. Unless there is a typo that was missed, or some bad grammar, Fast Drive Football is "done." (Famous last words right?). Since that time, I have been sketching out the framework for a fictional mode. I brainstormed a number of ideas at the recent PLAAY-dot-CON with friends, some of which made it into the design and others that would take the design way deeper than I would like.

To be clear, this is not the "kitchen sink" expansion. Once again, I am developing the game and system that I  want to play. For those of you that know me and my gaming preferences, you know I hate games that feel like "playing a spreadsheet", and that I shy away from any game that is merely chart look ups with no soul. I also despise book-keeping; I just want to sit down and play. I don't want to have to access a spreadsheet and keep copious stats to have fun.  That is why I made the decision months ago that my design for any sort of season-to-season progression system would require no excessive book-keeping.  The only thing you will need to track in the Commissioner Expansion is wins & losses, standings, and playoff results. 

The change from calling the expansion Franchise Mode, to the Commissioner Expansion comes from the ultimate focus of the expansion - which is giving the gamer the ability to be the commissioner of their own league (or leagues!). Rather than speak about the different features and nuances of the game in rule-book detail, I thought it would be more interesting to maintain a blog where I can share stories from the league I started as part of testing, as well as provide insight into how the mode works.  The next post will document the outcome of the inaugural draft of my first league using the Commissioner Expansion.